Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40874089›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025

UAV-based multitier feature selection improves nitrogen content estimation in arid-region cotton.

Fengxiu Li, Chongqi Zhao, Yingjie Ma, Ning Lv, Yanzhao Guo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Fengxiu Li *College of Hydraulic and Civil Engineering, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi, China.
Chongqi Zhao *College of Hydraulic and Civil Engineering, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi, China.
Yingjie MaCollege of Hydraulic and Civil Engineering, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi, China.
Ning LvKey Laboratory of North-west Oasis Water-Saving Agriculture, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural and Reclamation Sciences, Shihezi, Xinjiang, China.
Yanzhao GuoCollege of Hydraulic and Civil Engineering, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Nitrogen plays a pivotal role in determining cotton yield and fiber quality. Nevertheless, because high-dimensional remote-sensing data are inherently complex and redundant, accurately estimating cotton plant nitrogen concentration (PNC) from unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) imagery remains problematic, which in turn constrains both model precision and transferability. Methods: Accordingly, this study introduces a hierarchical feature-selection scheme combining Elastic Net and Boruta-SHAP to eliminate redundant remote-sensing variables and evaluates six machine-learning algorithms to pinpoint the optimal method for estimating cotton nitrogen status. Results: Our findings reveal that five critical features (Mean_B, Mean_R, NDRE_GOSAVI, NDVI, GRVI) markedly enhanced model performance. Among the tested algorithms, random forest achieved superior performance (R² = 0.97-0.98; RMSE = 0.05-0.08), exceeding all alternatives. Both in-field observations and model outputs demonstrate that cotton PNC consistently decreases throughout development, but optimal conditions of 450 mm irrigation and 300 kg N ha⁻¹ sustain relatively elevated nitrogen levels. Discussion: Collectively, the study provides robust guidance for precision nitrogen management in cotton production within arid regions.

Indexed as

Boruta-SHAPcottonElastic Netmachine learningmultispectral imagerynitrogen

Identifiers

PMID40874089
PMCPMC12378829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.