Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40874085›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025

Deceptive

Corinna Etl, Florian Etl, Robin Guilhot, Herbert Braunschmid, Karin Gross, Stefan Dötterl

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Corinna EtlDepartment of Environment and Biodiversity, Paris Lodron University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Florian EtlDepartment of Botany and Biodiversity Research, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Robin GuilhotCHITINE - Etudes Entomologiques, Caluire-et-Cuire, France.
Herbert BraunschmidDepartment of Environment and Biodiversity, Paris Lodron University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Karin GrossDepartment of Environment and Biodiversity, Paris Lodron University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Stefan DötterlDepartment of Environment and Biodiversity, Paris Lodron University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The vast majority of flowering plants depend on animal pollinators for sexual reproduction. These plants usually provide a reward, such as nectar and/or pollen, to their pollinators, and floral scent is often key to attract them. Some plants, however, do not provide any such reward, though they advertise one. Even though it is well known that such a food-deceptive pollination strategy is particularly common in orchids, the role of floral scent in attracting pollinators in such systems is often poorly understood. In this study, we compared the floral scent of the Eurasian deceptive lady's slipper orchid

Indexed as

co-flowering communitydeceptive pollinationgeneralized food-deceptionmimicryorchidvolatile organic compounds

Identifiers

PMID40874085
PMCPMC12378319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.