ArticleAesthetic surgery journal. Open forum2025
Argon Plasma-Assisted Liposuction for Arm Contouring: Safety, Efficacy, and Skin Tightening Outcomes.
Article in Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Brachioplasty remains the gold standard for addressing excess skin on the arms. However, because of visible scarring and potential complications, new technologies have been explored to enhance skin tightening in combination with liposuction. Objectives: The authors of this study evaluate the safety and efficacy of argon plasma-assisted liposuction (APAL) for upper-arm contouring by quantifying changes in ptosis reduction, arm diameter, and skin elasticity. Methods: Fifteen patients (30 arms) were included in the study. All patients underwent power-assisted liposuction combined with argon plasma at 50 W for 3 min per arm. Follow-ups were conducted at 10, 30, and 180 days postprocedure. Cutaneous temperature was measured before treatment and at 1 and 5 min after argon plasma application. The variables assessed at the maximal point of convexity of the abducted arm included thickness (measured through ultrasound), ptosis, diameter (measured using a 3-dimensional camera), and elasticity (measured with a Cutometer). Patient satisfaction was evaluated using the ARM-Q test. Results: Compared with preoperative levels, there was a significant reduction in all parameters (ptosis, diameter, thickness, and skin elasticity) at each follow-up point. Results stabilized from Day 30 onward. By the end of the study, the mean reduction was 29% for ptosis, 15% for diameter, and 42.7% for thickness. Patient satisfaction (ARM-Q) was notably high, with an average increase from 1.6 to 3 (85%). No major complications were observed, and skin heating remained within a safe threshold. Conclusions: APAL may be a safe and effective technique for upper-arm contouring, particularly in patients with mild-to-moderate skin laxity. Level of Evidence 4 Therapeutic:
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.