ArticleThe Southern African journal of critical care : the official journal of the Critical Care Society2025
Making sense of the outcome of a rehabilitation implementation trial in the intensive care unit: Mixed methods.
Article in The Southern African journal of critical care : the official journal of the Critical Care Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Evidence for implementation of evidence-based protocols (EBPs) in resource-constrained intensive care units (ICUs) is sparse. Objectives: To evaluate a tailored best-practice multifaceted strategy for implementation of a validated physiotherapy EBP for the management of surgical ICU (SICU) patients. Also, to explore the physiotherapists' perceptions regarding the implementation process and factors affecting protocol adherence, guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Methods: A type 2 hybrid implementation study design was applied, including all adult patients admitted over 16 months to two (control and experimental) SICUs in Western Cape Province, South Africa. The physiotherapists eligible to participate in the qualitative study (N=17) were those who participated in the implementation process and worked in the experimental SICU. The Therapeutic Index Scoring System-28 (TISS-28) and four process of care indicators (POCIs) were the primary and secondary outcomes, respectively, both analysed in Stata version 15. Thematic content analysis of textual data generated physiotherapists' perceptions of the implementation process. Results: The intervention strategy did not result in protocol adherence, with no significant difference (p>0.05) in TISS-28 and POCI outcomes during and after implementation in the experimental unit and all phases of the control. Physiotherapists (71%; n=12/17) perceived that the process affected their thinking and clinical decision-making, but not the organisation of physiotherapy services, except for a more multidisciplinary approach to care in the experimental unit. Organisational factors (time constraints, workload/flow barriers) affected adherence, explaining the lack of practice change. Conclusion: The importance of organisational change and support of the physiotherapy departments providing services to ICUs while also addressing the healthcare needs of a diverse group of hospitalised patients is highlighted. Contribution of the study: The study provides insights for rehabilitation implementation in resource-constrained intensive care settings. It highlights the importance of taking the next step towards implementation in complex environments and a new approach to facilitating the uptake of evidence and ensuring sustainable change through addressing the structural and organisational aspects of physiotherapy service delivery and care, and the inclusion of a multidisciplinary team approach to the implementation of any discipline-specific evidence-based protocols in the intensive care setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.