ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2025
The Impact of Intelligent Medical Systems Combined with Interdisciplinary Care Teams on Home-Based Elderly Population's Quality of Life.
Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Impact of Intelligent Medical Systems Combined with Interdisciplinary Care Teams in Home-Based Care Services for Disabled Elderly Individuals: A Prospective Intervention Study.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study examines the efficacy of an intelligent medical-elderly care integration model for improving quality of life among homebound seniors in Yuhua District, Changsha, China. Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted from May 2022 to April 2024 with 100 participants allocated equally to control and intervention groups through convenience sampling. While both groups received standard care, the intervention group additionally received intelligent care services. Outcomes were assessed using Activities of Daily Living (ADL), Physical Activity Performance (PAP), and Social-Cognitive Adaptation Assessment (SCAA) scales. Results: The intervention group demonstrated statistically significant improvements across all measures (P<0.05), with particularly notable outcomes in disability level transitions: moderate disability cases increased from 26% to 70%, while severe cases decreased from 58% to 14% (P<0.05). Comparative analysis revealed the intervention group significantly outperformed controls in PAP and SCAA scores (P<0.05). Conclusion: The intelligent care model proves effective in enhancing functional capacity and reducing care dependency among homebound elderly, offering valuable insights for elderly care service optimization. Further research should explore long-term sustainability and cost-effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.