Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40873903›Full record

ArticleVisual cognition2025

Meaning maps predict reaction time in change detection.

Alan Z Lu, Aditya Upadhyayula, John M Henderson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Visual cognition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alan Z LuCenter for Mind and Brain, University of California, Davis.ORCID 0009-0007-3338-8194
Aditya UpadhyayulaDepartment of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis.ORCID 0000-0001-5146-8680
John M HendersonCenter for Mind and Brain, University of California, Davis.ORCID 0000-0002-1745-037X

Funding

Vision Science Training Program: Cornea to CortexT32EY015387 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI MARIE E BURNS · 2003 to 2026
$4.8M
Guiding Attention in Real-World ScenesR01EY027792 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI John M Henderson · 2017 to 2026
$2.5M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY027792NEI NIH HHS T32 EY015387
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To detect changes in our visual environments, the visual system compares pre-and post-change representations maintained in active working memory. Previous research has suggested that change detection is primarily informed by high-level semantics in naturalistic scenes. Here, across two experiments, we used meaning maps - a data driven method to measure the visual semantic information in naturalistic scenes - to investigate whether semantic features predicted visual change detection in a flicker paradigm. Experiment 1 showed that changes in highly meaningful regions were more easily detected than changes in non-meaningful regions despite controlling for low-level visual saliency. Experiment 2 found that the meaning-driven advantage was significantly reduced by scene inversion, further supporting the role of semantics in change detection. Together, these results demonstrate that the visual system relies on semantic features during change detection.

Indexed as

change detectionmeaning mapsscene inversionscene perceptionscene semantics

Identifiers

PMID40873903
PMCPMC12380198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.