Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40873893›Full record

ArticleBrain communications2025

Structural and functional connectivity of vestibular graviceptive to sensory and motor circuits.

Julian Conrad, Laurenz Eberle, Bernhard Baier, Rainer Boegle, Marianne Dieterich, Andreas Zwergal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Julian ConradDepartment of Neurology and German Center for Vertigo and Balance Disorders, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich 81377, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7912-0571
Laurenz EberleDepartment of Neurology and German Center for Vertigo and Balance Disorders, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich 81377, Germany.
Bernhard BaierDepartment of Neurology, Edith Stein Fachklinik Bad Bergzabern, Bad Bergzabern 76887, Germany.
Rainer BoegleDepartment of Neurology and German Center for Vertigo and Balance Disorders, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich 81377, Germany.
Marianne DieterichDepartment of Neurology and German Center for Vertigo and Balance Disorders, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich 81377, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9903-9594
Andreas ZwergalDepartment of Neurology and German Center for Vertigo and Balance Disorders, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich 81377, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3839-8398

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Processing of vestibular graviceptive signals from the inner ear is essential for spatial perception, bipedal stance, locomotion, and navigation in a three-dimensional world. Acute unilateral ischaemic lesions along the central vestibular pathways lead to deficits of gravitational processing which can be quantified as perceptual tilts of the subjective visual vertical (SVV). For ipsiversive and contraversive directional tilts, dichotomous networks were documented from the brainstem to the thalamus. In the current lesion-network mapping study, we asked whether this dichotomy of directional tilts of gravitational processing is maintained at the cortical level. 107 patients with acute right-hemispheric infarcts (mean age 66 years, ±13 years) in the territory of the middle cerebral artery were included in the study. To examine the association of tilts of the SVV with lesion locations, support-vector regression lesion-symptom mapping (SVR-LSM) was used with tilt of the SVV as a continuous variable. Analyses were carried out for ipsi- and contraversive tilts separately. In addition, we performed disconnectome mapping and SVR-LSM-disconnectome analyses by referencing lesions to a normative connectome detect structural networks associated with SVV tilts. Similarly, functional connectivity mapping was used to determine the functional networks associated with SVV tilts. The SVR-LSM with the functional maps revealed the statistical association between SVV tilt and functional networks. The SVR-LSM analysis demonstrated distinct clusters associated with either ipsi- or contraversive SVV tilts. Ipsiversive tilt clusters were centered around the parieto-(retro)-insular opercular cortex [PIVC, retroinsular area (Ri), posterior insular long gyrus (Ig), parietal operculum (OP2-3)]. The contraversive tilt cluster showed additional involvement of the motor system (basal ganglia) and the ventral prefrontal cortex (Brodman area BA44, inferior frontal gyrus). In lesions with ipsiversive tilts, a disconnection of fronto-insular tracts and the arcuate fascicle was found. Contraversive tilt related disconnection was observed in the superior longitudinal fascicle (SLFII) and the medial temporal cortex (perirhinal, entorhinal cortex). Cortico-fugal connections could be traced down via the thalamus to the cerebellum and vestibular nuclei. The functional networks associated with ipsiversive and contraversive tilts showed a similar pattern: more restricted in the core vestibular and ocular motor cortical network for ipsiversive tilts, additional involvement of the motor system for contraversive tilts. Thus, the current data demonstrate partly separated cortical networks for gravitational processing associated with directional SVV tilts. These could imply differential routes of vestibular input for sensory and motor processing.

Indexed as

balancebasal gangliacorticallesion-network mappingsubjective visual vertical (SVV)

Identifiers

PMID40873893
PMCPMC12378872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.