ArticleCentral European journal of urology2025
Investigation of irrigation fluid temperature variations caused by thulium fiber laser with various settings and comparison with Ho:YAG laser: An
Article in Central European journal of urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Our experimental Material and methods: All measurements were performed with a fluid volume fixed at 10 ml and an outflow rate at 10 ml/min. The laser was fired continuously for 30 seconds with total power settings of 10 W, 20 W, 40 W, and 60 W with different power settings (energy × frequency) and various pulse combinations using TFL and Ho: YAG laser (Quanta System, Samarate, Italy). Results: Higher temperatures were recorded when the power was increased from 10 W, 20 W, 40 W, to 60 W. The temperature exceeded the threshold of 43°C when power settings of ≥40 W were applied regardless of frequency (15-120 Hz) and energy (0.5-4 J). Similar temperature increase patterns were reported with different peak power settings. No major differences were found when the same power settings were applied using TFL and Ho: YAG lasers. Conclusions: Based on our results temperatures >43°C were recorded for power settings ≥40 W after continuous laser firing of 30 seconds using TFL. Modifying the frequency and energy settings, as well as firing with Ho:YAG laser under the same power setting did not affect the patterns of temperature increase. Generally, the TFL shows more regular thermal behavior in comparison with the Ho:YAG laser.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.