Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40873874›Full record

ReviewCentral European journal of urology2025

Reclassification of prostate cancer on first confirmatory prostate biopsy in men under active surveillance: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Benjamin M Mac Curtain, Killian Daly, Gavin Calpin, Eoin Collins, Avinash Deshwal, Olwyn Lynch, Wanyang Qian, Aaron O'Mahony, Hugo C Temperley, Reuben D Mac Curtain and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Central European journal of urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Prostate cancer: Improving lives by not "overtreating" patients.Central European journal of urology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Benjamin M Mac CurtainDepartment of Urology, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Killian DalyDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Gavin CalpinDepartment of Urology, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Eoin CollinsDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland.
Avinash DeshwalDepartment of Radiology, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, Western Australia.
Olwyn LynchDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Wanyang QianDepartment of Surgery, St John of God Midland Hospital, Perth, Western Australia.
Aaron O'MahonyDepartment of Surgery, University Hospital Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Hugo C TemperleyDepartment of Radiology, St James' University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Reuben D Mac CurtainSchool of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Diarmaid MoranDepartment of Urology, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
John A O KellyDepartment of Urology, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Catherine DowlingDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Galway, Galway, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Prostate cancer is typically diagnosed following prostate biopsy. In low-risk and selected favourable intermediate-risk disease, active surveillance is the treatment strategy of choice. In these men, a confirmatory biopsy performed. We report on the rates of risk upgrading at biopsy confirmatory that may represent a need to pursue further treatment in lieu of active surveillance. Material and methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of pooled reclassification rates of men on active surveillance at first confirmatory biopsy, in line with PRISMA recommendations. PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane central registry for clinical trials were searched until June 2024. Stata was used to pool reclassification rates at first confirmatory biopsy. Results: Seventeen studies from 9 countries comprising 6,039 patients were included. Transrectal biopsy was the most common biopsy method for confirmatory biopsy. Weighted pooled rates of upgrading on first confirmatory biopsy were 20% with a 95% confidence interval of 19-21%. Conclusions: Approximately 20% of men undergoing active surveillance were upgraded at confirmatory biopsy. This may alter the management of these patients, and it highlights the importance of a confirmatory biopsy.

Indexed as

active surveillanceGleason scoreprostate biopsyprostate cancer

Identifiers

PMID40873874
PMCPMC12379824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.