ReviewCentral European journal of urology2025
Comparative efficacy and safety of silodosin and tadalafil combination or monotherapy for treating lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic obstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in Central European journal of urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Over the last few years, trends in managing benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) have improved, advancing from reliance on surgery to satisfactory medical therapies. However, the efficacy and safety of combination therapies, including silodosin and tadalafil, are not well established compared to monotherapy for treating lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to benign prostatic obstruction (BPO). Material and methods: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library, and Scopus up to April 1, 2024. The quality of the studies was assessed using The Cochrane Risk of Bias (RoB) Tools 2 and Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Exposures (ROBINS-E). Meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.4. Results: A total of 1,300 records were screened, resulting in 7 final studies. Our meta-analyses showed that international prostate symptom score (IPSS), maximum urine flow rate (Q Conclusions: Silodosin and tadalafil are effective for treating LUTS in men due to BPO, especially when used in combination. However, with concerns about safety, tadalafil as monotherapy offers an advantage for patients with fertility desires due to its favorable side effect profile.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.