Articlei-Perception
Gender differences in face pareidolia: The effect of cognitive style and judgment criteria.
Article in i-Perception. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Face pareidolia refers to perceiving facial features on inanimate objects. Previous studies have identified gender differences in pareidolia, but the factors behind these differences remain unclear. This study examined potential influences, including task requirement, low-frequency information encoding ability, and cognitive style. University student participants reported what they saw in face-like object images and rated their face-likeness. A delayed matching task with blurred faces assessed encoding ability, and the Navon task examined cognitive style. Results showed that gender differences were influenced by task demands: women were more likely than men to perceive faces in objects, and this was not related to facial configuration processing. Additionally, a global processing tendency predicted higher pareidolia in women but not in men. Our findings suggest that gender differences in pareidolia are shaped by judgment criteria, with women adopting more relaxed criteria. This research contributes to understanding gender differences in social cognition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.