Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40873861›Full record

ArticleHealth affairs scholar2025

Ambulatory care for individuals dually eligible for Medicare and Medicaid.

Joshua M Liao, Paula Chatterjee, Yueming Zhao, Isabelle J Carroll, Danielle S Browne, Austin S Kilaru, Aidan P Crowley, David Pagnotti, Torrey Shirk, Deborah S Cousins and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health affairs scholar, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Joshua M LiaoDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, United States.
Paula ChatterjeeDepartment of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6514-0405
Yueming ZhaoThe Parity Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States.
Isabelle J CarrollDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-2563-4048
Danielle S BrowneDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-5667-9322
Austin S KilaruThe Parity Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3141-1772
Aidan P CrowleyThe Parity Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4606-5622
David PagnottiLeonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States.
Torrey ShirkLeonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-4645-2405
Deborah S CousinsLeonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5468-9745
Amol S NavatheThe Parity Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7182-4988

Funding

Implementing patient-centered strategies to optimize hospitalization decisions for emergency department patients with acute heart failureK23HL171859 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI AUSTIN SRINIVAS KILARU · 2024 to 2026
$585k
NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL171859
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Individuals dually eligible for insurance through both Medicaid and Medicare ("duals") have more comorbidities, higher costs, and poorer outcomes compared to other groups. Unfortunately, policy and care redesign initiatives suffer from limited knowledge about ambulatory care patterns among duals. Methods: Using 2022 Medicare fee-for-service claims and other sources of clinician and geographic data, we described care patterns for ambulatory services among dual vs non-duals. Our sample consisted of 967 820 dual and 4 600 486 non-dual individuals receiving a total of 67 122 906 ambulatory services from 106 545 practices and 815 827 clinicians. Results: We found that duals received fewer ambulatory, in particular subspecialty, services than non-duals, while duals received slightly more services through primary care physicians and advanced practice professionals. Among duals, most services were provided in office rather than federally qualified health centers or rural health clinics by a disproportionally small number of geographically dispersed practices and clinicians. High-dual practices and clinicians differed from non-high dual counterparts with respect to multiple characteristics. Conclusion: These differences highlight the opportunity to improve access and outcomes among duals by targeting policy and practice changes toward certain groups and clinicians.

Indexed as

health disparitieshealth equityMedicaidMedicare

Identifiers

PMID40873861
PMCPMC12380179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.