ArticleJournal of biomedical optics2025
Studies of
Article in Journal of biomedical optics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Significance: Laser speckle contrast imaging (LSCI) is widely used for intraoperative blood flow monitoring, but traditional methods have limitations in imaging low blood flow velocities and small vessels. An improved LSCI method, termed the fluent imaging technique, is proposed to enhance imaging sensitivity and accuracy, providing real-time and high-resolution blood flow assessment for neurosurgical applications. Aim: We aim to validate the performance of the fluent imaging technique in imaging small vessels with low blood flow velocities and assess its application in cerebrovascular surgical procedures, including carotid artery clamping, reperfusion, and ferric chloride Approach: The fluent imaging technique was validated Results: The fluent imaging technique improved image quality, particularly for small vessels and low-velocity blood flow, compared with traditional LSCI methods. In capillary regions, it achieved up to 189% improvement in SBR over spatial contrast (SK) and 37% over AWSDK. In a selected region of interest, the SBR increased from 0.53 (SK) and 1.12 (AWSDK) to 1.53 with the fluent imaging method. In carotid artery interventions, the method effectively captured dynamic blood flow changes, including early Relative Blood Flow Index (RBFI) recovery after clamp release. In Conclusions: The fluent imaging technique enhances the accuracy and sensitivity of LSCI for blood flow monitoring in neurosurgery. It provides reliable real-time intraoperative assessment of vascular conditions, improving surgical safety and efficacy. We establish a foundation for its broader clinical application and further optimization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.