Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40873851›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Hormonal Contraceptives and the Gut Microbiome in Female Athletes: Implications for Health, Performance, and Exercise-Related Physiological Adjustments.

Weronika Pierudzka, Józef Slawatycki, Paula Klemenska, Konrad Warczak, Paulina Wasilewska, Paulina Horwat, Jan Górski

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Weronika PierudzkaHospital Medicine, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznań, POL.
Józef SlawatyckiHospital Medicine, Jan Biziel University Hospital No. 2, Bydgoszcz, POL.
Paula KlemenskaHospital Medicine, Jan Biziel University Hospital No. 2, Bydgoszcz, POL.
Konrad WarczakHospital Medicine, District Public Hospital, Juraszów, POL.
Paulina WasilewskaHospital Medicine, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznań, POL.
Paulina HorwatHospital Medicine, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznań, POL.
Jan GórskiHospital Medicine, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznań, POL.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hormonal contraceptives are widely used among female athletes, with documented prevalence rates varying from 29% to 65% across different sports disciplines. Growing evidence suggests that hormonal contraceptives may influence the diversity and composition of the gut microbiome. A particular concern is a potential reduction in beneficial bacteria responsible for producing short-chain fatty acids, which could impact both overall health and the body's adaptation to exercise training. This narrative review examines the current understanding of the links between hormonal contraceptive use, changes in gut bacteria, and exercise-related physiological adaptations in female athletes. A comprehensive literature search of PubMed and Google Scholar (2017-2025) was conducted using terms related to hormonal contraception, gut microbiota, and exercise. Due to the scarcity of studies directly investigating all three factors together, the search also included research on the relationships between each pair of these elements. Eighty-eight relevant articles were identified and included. While regular physical activity is generally known to support a healthy and diverse gut microbiome, hormonal contraception might counteract these positive effects. Hormonal contraceptives appear capable of disrupting the community of gut microbes involved in regulating estrogen, potentially reducing overall microbial diversity and promoting harmful imbalances. Critically, within the scope of this review, only one pilot study has been identified as directly exploring these interactions in female athletes. This key study found that athletes using hormonal contraceptives showed a decrease in the types of gut bacteria that produce beneficial short-chain fatty acids. Proposed pathways through which contraceptive-induced microbial changes might affect exercise adaptation and performance include alterations in energy metabolism, impaired immune function, weakening of the gut barrier, and disruption of natural hormonal balance. The impact likely depends on the specific type of contraceptive used, with combined oral contraceptives potentially having stronger effects than progestin-only methods. Given the current limited evidence, particularly the lack of direct studies beyond the pilot study mentioned, it is premature to draw definitive causal conclusions. However, the potential interactions suggest important practical implications. These include developing individualized approaches to training programming, nutritional strategies (such as optimizing fiber and prebiotic intake to support beneficial microbes), and contraceptive counseling for female athletes (e.g., involving physicians, sports dietitians, and coaches). Future research must prioritize well-designed studies, including randomized controlled trials and long-term observations, specifically in athletic populations. Such research is essential to develop evidence-based guidelines that can help optimize both the health and performance of female athletes who use hormonal contraception. To our knowledge, this review is the first to synthesize the complex relationship between contraceptive use, gut bacteria, and exercise adaptation specifically within female athletic cohorts.

Indexed as

athletic performanceexercise adaptationfemale athletesgut microbiomehormonal contraceptivesphysical exercise

Identifiers

PMID40873851
PMCPMC12378088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.