Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40873840›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Effectiveness of Three-Dimensional Printing in the Management of Orthopedic Sarcoma Patients: A Systematic Review.

Mohamed Elgamal, Ahmed Elnewishy, Sohaib Shah, Tarek Hassanin, Mahmoud Noureldin, Ahmed Hamada, Muawia Yousif Fadlelmola Mohamed, Hatem Hussein, Kayden Chahal

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mohamed ElgamalTrauma and Orthopaedics, Southend University Hospital, Mid and South Essex NHS Foundation Trust, Southend on Sea, GBR.
Ahmed ElnewishyTrauma and Orthopaedics, Royal Berkshire Hospital, Reading, GBR.
Sohaib ShahTrauma and Orthopaedics, Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust, Tunbridge Wells, GBR.
Tarek HassaninTrauma and Orthopaedics, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Surrey, GBR.
Mahmoud NoureldinTrauma and Orthopaedics, University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust, Brighton, GBR.
Ahmed HamadaTrauma and Orthopaedics, Royal Devon and Exeter University Hospital, Devon, GBR.
Muawia Yousif Fadlelmola MohamedTrauma and Orthopaedics, Southend University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Essex, GBR.
Hatem HusseinTrauma and Orthopaedics, Southend Hospital, Essex, GBR.
Kayden ChahalTrauma and Orthopaedics, NHS, London, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Orthopedic sarcomas present unique surgical challenges due to their anatomical complexity and the need to balance oncologic control with functional preservation. Three-dimensional (3D) printing has emerged as a promising technology to improve surgical precision through patient-specific planning and reconstruction. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness, safety, and clinical applications of 3D printing in the management of orthopedic sarcomas. Following PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, and institutional databases for studies published between 2016 and 2025. Twenty studies involving 296 patients with primary bone sarcomas treated using 3D-printed implants, resection guides, or hybrid constructs were included. The most common anatomical sites were the pelvis, sacrum, and long bones. The majority of studies reported high rates of negative surgical margins, with at least 14 of 18 studies achieving R0 resections in over 90% of cases. Functional outcomes were favorable, with pooled Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) scores averaging 78-80% of normal limb function, particularly in reconstructions of the ankle, femur, and tibia. The overall complication rate was 22%, with wound morbidity and infection being the most frequent adverse events. Comparative cohorts demonstrated improved surgical accuracy and lower complication rates in the 3D-assisted groups. While early outcomes are promising and support the utility of 3D printing in enhancing personalized oncologic surgery, further prospective studies with standardized outcome measures are needed to validate long-term benefits and inform wider clinical adoption.

Indexed as

‎3d printingbone tumour and limb salvageorthopedic sarcomapatient-specific implantsreconstruction planningsurgical oncology management

Identifiers

PMID40873840
PMCPMC12378897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.