ArticleJournal of pain research2025
Neuraxial Homeostasis - Optimizing Neuraxial Labor Analgesia.
Article in Journal of pain research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Neuraxial homeostasis-guided labor analgesia to reduce neurologic symptom and enhance maternal satisfaction: a randomized clinical trial.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
At present, few studies on labor analgesia focus on preventing and managing neurological complications, and there is a lack of specific operational guidelines for clinical practice. This study aims to compare spinal analgesia-epidural analgesia (SA-EA) and combined spinal-epidural analgesia (CSEA) in reducing neurological complications during labor analgesia. SA-EA group: A standard spinal needle (0.5 × 113mm) was first inserted to perform a dural puncture, and 2mL of 0.1% ropivacaine + 1µg/mL sufentanil was injected intrathecally. After the spinal needle was withdrawn, a standard epidural needle (1.6 × 80mm) was used to perform an epidural puncture, and an epidural catheter (1.0mm) was inserted approximately 4cm into the epidural space. Twenty minutes later, an epidural analgesia pump was connected. CSEA group: A standard epidural needle (1.6 × 80mm) was first inserted for epidural puncture. A spinal needle was then passed through the epidural needle to perform a dural puncture, and 2mL of 0.1% ropivacaine + 1µg/mL sufentanil was injected intrathecally. After the spinal needle was removed, an epidural catheter (1.0mm) was inserted approximately 4cm into the epidural space. Twenty minutes later, an epidural analgesia pump was connected. We hypothesize that there may be differences in the incidence of neurological complications between the two groups. It is pioneering and significant as it starts from actual clinical operations. By in-depth comparing SA-EA and CSEA techniques, the study is expected to provide important references for clinical practice, improving the safety and efficacy of labor analgesia and reducing neurological complications. Additionally, it is the first time to propose the concept of neuraxial homeostasis in the anesthesia field, which is of great importance to the development of the discipline.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.