Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40873786›Full record

ArticleISME communications2025

Ecological resilience in ulcerative colitis: microbial dynamics of donor and resident species in a longitudinal fecal microbiota transplantation study.

Susanne Pinto, Elisa Benincà, Sam Nooij, Elisabeth M Terveer, Josbert J Keller, Andrea E van der Meulen-de Jong, Ewout W Steyerberg, Johannes A Bogaards

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ISME communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Susanne PintoDepartment of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Einthovenweg 20, 2333 ZC Leiden, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7422-9519
Elisa BenincàCentre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Antonie van Leeuwenhoeklaan 9, 3721 MA Bilthoven, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9261-9315
Sam NooijLeiden University Center for Infectious Diseases (LUCID) Research, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZG Leiden, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5892-5637
Elisabeth M TerveerLeiden University Center for Infectious Diseases (LUCID) Research, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZG Leiden, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1994-5421
Josbert J KellerNetherlands Donor Feces Bank, LUCID Medical Microbiology & Infection Control, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZG Leiden, the Netherlands.
Andrea E van der Meulen-de JongDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZG Leiden, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9353-5431
Ewout W SteyerbergDepartment of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Einthovenweg 20, 2333 ZC Leiden, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7787-0122
Johannes A BogaardsDepartment of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3389-5141

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is a promising treatment for the chronic immune-mediated disease ulcerative colitis (UC). However, the microbial dynamics underlying clinical remission remain poorly understood. To investigate these dynamics, we analysed data from 22 UC patients treated with four rounds of FMT donated by two healthy donors. Microbiota samples from patients were collected at nine timepoints before, during, and after treatment, covering a period of 14 weeks. Additionally, 27 donor samples were analysed. Species in the recipients' gut microbiota were categorised into ecological categories based on their origin and temporal dynamics: species already present in the recipient pre-FMT, species derived from the donor, or novel species, i.e. absent before FMT in both recipient and donor but detected during or after treatment. Overdispersed Poisson regression models were employed to model the number of species within each category over time. Furthermore, we investigated the change in relative abundance for recipient, colonising, and novel species. The results revealed that recipient species with higher relative abundances prior to FMT were more likely to persist following FMT. Notably, patients who achieved combined clinical and endoscopic remission at week 14 retained a higher number of recipient species compared to non-responders. In contrast, non-responders initially exhibited colonisation of more donor species than responders, but colonisation rate decreased over time in non-responders whereas colonisation rate remained stable in responders. These findings suggest that clinical remission following FMT is associated with controlled incorporation of donor species without replacement of resident species, which may reflect a resilient recipient gut community.

Indexed as

ecological successiongastrointestinal microbiomespecies dynamics

Identifiers

PMID40873786
PMCPMC12378841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.