ArticleEuropean heart journal. Case reports2025
Successful implantation of an extravascular implantable cardioverter-defibrillator in a patient with moderate pectus excavatum: a case report.
Article in European heart journal. Case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) prevent sudden cardiac death due to ventricular arrhythmia. A novel extravascular ICD (EV-ICD) system provides improved functionality over previous transvenous (TV-ICD) and subcutaneous (S-ICD) alternatives, particularly in younger patients. This includes limited bradycardia pacing, anti-tachycardia pacing therapy, and lower energy defibrillation, all within a smaller device profile compared to the S-ICD. Due to the need for substernal lead placement, however, complex sternal anatomy is currently considered a relative contraindication to their use. Case summary: We present a 38-year-old male patient with pectus excavatum and a previous episode of ventricular fibrillation leading to out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Initial implantation of a S-ICD was associated with repeated inappropriate shocks over 4 years, leading to multidisciplinary discussions with the patient regarding off-label use of an EV-ICD, as approved by Medtronic CRM. Explantation of the S-ICD and implantation of the EV-ICD were successful, with minimal technical changes required compared to standard surgical technique in normal sternal anatomy. At 6-month follow-up, there were no complications or inappropriate shocks. Discussion: The EV-ICD may be considered in patients with pectus excavatum, making this novel device available to a larger proportion of patients. Aside from careful consideration of instrument positioning during the procedure, this can be done with minimal changes to the standard surgical protocol.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.