ArticleCanadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique2025
Determinants of supportive care experiences for women living with breast cancer in rural communities of British Columbia.
Article in Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Knowledge Translation Initiative to Improve Interdisciplinary Approaches to Psychosocial Oncology Among Community Stakeholders in Rural Regions of British Columbia.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Enabling women with breast cancer to actively participate in their care requires a better understanding of the interplay between contextual factors and mediators. This research explored the determinants of supportive care experiences for women living with breast cancer in rural communities of British Columbia. Methods: The study used a quantitative, descriptive, cross-sectional design. A survey regarding demographic, health, decision support, and breast cancer supportive care experiences was administered to 100 participants. Results: The combination of being less than 40 years old, having an undergraduate education, and being three to five years post-diagnosis is associated with higher (more positive) total survey scores. A linear combination of undergraduate school and health problems post-treatment showed higher medical treatment scores, with R Conclusion: The findings emphasize the growing need for psychosocial and emotional supportive care for cancer survivors. The results highlight the potential benefits of informed decision-support tools to fortify supportive care, emphasizing the need to facilitate better supportive care services for women battling breast cancer. Recommendation: Supportive care plays a crucial role in guiding individuals' experiences with cancer through the healthcare system. Increasing supportive care centres, especially in rural areas, could improve patient-reported outcomes, and experiences, and ensure timely access to care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.