Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40873748›Full record

ArticleCanadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique2025

Breast and colorectal cancer survivors' experience with transition to primary care provider follow-up care : A qualitative study on cancer type and sex.

Lauriane Giguère, Brittany Mutsaers, Dina Babiker, Paola Garcia, Tori Langmuir, Carrie MacDonald-Liska, Justin Presseau, Gail Larocque, Cheryl Harris, Marie-Hélène Chomienne and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2026
    Article
  2. What are the Barriers and Enablers of Survivorship Care Plan Use by Breast and Colorectal Cancer Survivors?Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Lauriane GiguèreSchool of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Brittany MutsaersSchool of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Dina BabikerFaculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Paola GarciaSchool of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Tori LangmuirThe Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Carrie MacDonald-LiskaFaculty of Education, St. Francis Xavier University, Antigonish, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Justin PresseauSchool of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada; The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Gail LarocqueThe Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Cheryl HarrisSchool of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada; The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada; The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Marie-Hélène ChomienneFaculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada; Institut du Savoir Montfort, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Kednapa ThavornThe Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada; School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Sophie LebelSchool of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As of 2024, 64% of cancer survivors live five years or longer after their treatment. However, this growing population, with its specific follow-up care needs, has struggled with the transition from active cancer treatment to follow-up in primary care. More information is required on what facilitates or hinders this transition. Potential factors that influence how cancer survivors experience this transition include sex and cancer type. Using secondary thematic and content analysis of 30 colorectal and breast cancer survivors interviews, we examined the impact of sex and cancer type on survivorship experiences. Themes extracted showed that sex and cancer type influenced survivors' experience of transition both intersectionally and separately. Colorectal cancer survivors reported more late and long-term side effects than breast cancer survivors, with differently described and experienced quality of life (QOL) and unmet needs. Males relied more on their wives to manage their follow-up care and were more distant with their healthcare providers, while females took charge of their own follow-up care and reported closeness to their healthcare providers, which favorably impacted their follow-up care transition.

Indexed as

cancer typefollow-up carequalitative methodssex and sexbased analysissociodemographic characteristicssurvivorship

Identifiers

PMID40873748
PMCPMC12379927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.