Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40873742›Full record

ArticleAustralian journal of psychology2025

Decolonising tertiary psychology programs in Australia: privileging Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples' voices.

Chontel Gibson, Joanna Alexi, Pat Dudgeon, Cammi Murrup-Stewart, Stacey McMullen, Darcey Decke, Jeneva Ohan, Amanda Taylor, Peter Gill, Monica Thielking and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Australian journal of psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Chontel GibsonSchool of Indigenous Studies, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia.
Joanna AlexiSchool of Indigenous Studies, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4088-5977
Pat DudgeonSchool of Indigenous Studies, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2799-5709
Cammi Murrup-StewartSchool of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria,Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4442-3238
Stacey McMullenSchool of Psychological Sciences, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0751-0607
Darcey DeckeSchool of Indigenous Studies, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia.
Jeneva OhanSchool of Psychological Sciences, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4801-4239
Amanda TaylorSchool of Psychology, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5412-9633
Peter GillInstitute for Health and Sport, Victoria University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7772-4849
Monica ThielkingSchool of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5932-2184
Belle SelkirkSchool of Indigenous Studies, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9048-2282

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The Australian Indigenous Psychology Education Program has paved the way for Indigenising and decolonising psychology programs. While Indigenisation and decolonisation of psychology programs are not yet consistent, exemplar initiatives have emerged within recent times. This paper showcases these exemplars, providing details about the "how to" privilege Indigenous knowledges and decolonising practices. Method: A qualitative research paradigm was used to highlight multiple descriptive case studies. An Aboriginal Participatory Action Research approach honoured Indigenous leadership and governance throughout the process, which supported the use of yarning as the data collection method. The methodological approach illustrated the importance of the psychology discipline supporting epistemological justice via the inclusion of Indigenous research methodologies. Results: The five case studies provided practical strategies and actions that other psychology education providers, and indeed other higher education providers, can use to decolonise discipline programs. Examples of enablers included Indigenous leadership in curricula design and student support within the psychology discipline challenges. Examples of challenges included a lack of resources and epistemological racism. Conclusions: This work reaffirms the call for urgent prioritisation to support, embed, and expand Indigenous knowledges and decolonising praxis within psychology and indeed, across broader health disciplines, in Australia and around the world.

Indexed as

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoplescultural responsivenessDecolonising psychology educationsocial and emotional wellbeing; case studies

Identifiers

PMID40873742
PMCPMC12379689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.