ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2025
Acute Structural Effects of Novel Endoscopic Cyclophotocoagulation versus Standard Endoscopic and Transscleral Cyclophotocoagulation.
Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To compare the acute structural changes of standard endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation (ECP), a novel ECP device (Leos™), and transscleral cyclophotocoagulation (TCP) on the ciliary processes and surrounding structures in human cadaveric eyes using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Patients and Methods: Three human cadaveric eyes were treated with standard ECP, Leos ECP, or TCP. Untreated areas served as controls. Tissues were prepared for SEM to evaluate microarchitectural changes in the ciliary processes and adjacent structures. Results: SEM imaging revealed that both standard and Leos ECP resulted in blunting of the ciliary processes without injury to collateral tissues. In contrast, TCP-treated tissues showed significant structural disorganization extending to the iris and pars plana. Conclusion: In this study, we demonstrate that both standard and novel Leos ECP techniques produce significantly less structural disruption to the ciliary processes compared to TCP. The Leos ECP system, with its enhanced imaging and automation features, may offer more clinical value through ease-of-use and improved consistency while still generating similar tissue effects to standard ECP. Additionally, these findings further validate the more targeted approach that ECP offers compared to TCP. However, no clinical outcomes were evaluated in this study, and further investigation is needed to determine how these findings translate to patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.