ArticleCanadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique2025
Reducing harm from paclitaxel infusion using titration rate: A quality improvement project.
Article in Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The number of paclitaxel infusion reactions was observed as the highest among all Cancer Medication Infusion Reactions (CMIR) in the Cancer Care and Hematology Clinic at Scarborough Health Network (SHN) despite the use of pre-medication. This quality improvement project was aimed at reducing the number of paclitaxel reactions and reducing extended chair time due to infusion reactions. Method: Our quality improvement strategy focused on monitoring paclitaxel reaction rates while using a standardized titration rate strategy for patients receiving the first three lifetime cycles of paclitaxel infusion for solid tumours or hematologic malignancies. The titration rate was calculated with a variety of drug volumes that are used within the Scarborough Health Network. Findings from the 4 months of piloting the titration rate strategy were compared to the previous 4 months when titration rates were not used. Result: Four months after introducing the new strategy, there were 35.71% paclitaxel reactions when a titration rate was used as compared to 51.35% reactions when a titration rate was not used. Patients who received paclitaxel infusion using titration rates increased the scheduled chair time to 30 minutes to allow for slower infusion rates, while patients with hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) required an extra 3 hours of chair time that was not pre-planned. Conclusion: There were fewer HSRs after the launch of the titration rate strategy in patients receiving paclitaxel for the first three lifetime cycles. This strategy also reduced overall chair time at the clinic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40873600PMC12379876What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.