ReviewFrontiers in reproductive health2025
Factors influencing menstrual hygiene knowledge, attitudes, and practices among adolescent girls in African rural schools: scoping review.
Review in Frontiers in reproductive health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Management of Menstrual Hygiene in Promoting Education Among Adolescent Girls in Enqucwini Education Zone in Mzimba District.Public health challenges · 2026Article
- Access to WASH facilities and health implications of period poverty among in-school girls in rural areas of Africa: a scoping review.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Article
- Non-linear multivariate decomposition modelling of the predictors of menstrual product use among reproductive-aged women: evidence from the 2022 Ghanaian demographic and health survey.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2026Article
- A review of the drivers and barriers influencing the impact of Water, Sanitation and Hygiene on attendance and retention of pupils in primary schools in developing countries.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Menstrual hygiene management (MHM) is a critical component of adolescent health and well-being, particularly in rural African schools where cultural, economic, and infrastructural challenges persist. This scoping review followed the steps proposed by Arksey and O'Malley to explore the factors influencing menstrual hygiene knowledge, attitudes, and practices among adolescent girls in rural African settings. The review systematically analysed literature conducted in diverse African rural public schools. Findings reveal that many adolescent school girls lack comprehensive knowledge about menstruation, due to unreliable or insufficient sources of menstrual hygiene management information and unpreparedness for menarche. Furthermore, their menstrual hygiene practices are shaped by various sociocultural and religious influences. There is also resource limitation, related to availability and cost of menstrual hygiene management supplies, and water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) infrastructure in rural schools. These challenges have a significant impact on school attendance, academic performance, and the overall quality of life for adolescent girls. The review practice. It emphasizes the importance of multi-sectoral approaches in supporting adolescent girls in rural African schools and advocates for further research to address persistent knowledge and practice gaps. There is also a need for integrated interventions, including menstrual health education, improved WASH infrastructure, and the provision of affordable menstrual products. Addressing these factors holistically can enhance menstrual hygiene management, reduce stigma, and promote gender equality in education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.