Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40873512›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

Giving justice to listening: exploring the impact of a novel dialogical approach to mental wellbeing on healthcare staff.

Isaac Nsiah, Cornelia Junghans, Henock B Taddese, Anna Dentschuk, Amanda Bueno de Mesquita, Matthew Ball

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Isaac NsiahSchool of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Cornelia JunghansSchool of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Henock B TaddeseSchool of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Anna DentschukHealthcare Central London, London, United Kingdom.
Amanda Bueno de MesquitaCentral North West London Health Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Matthew BallHumane Clinic, Adelaide, SA, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: A recent survey among health care workers in the United Kingdom revealed that over 75% experienced a mental health problem in the past year, with 42% reporting chronic stress. Poor mental wellbeing adversely affects patient outcomes and places a financial burden on the NHS. To address this issue, a novel dialogical approach called "Just Listening" (JL), originally used in community settings in Australia, has been introduced to train frontline workers in the United Kingdom. JL aims to maintain human-to-human connection and offers intentional listening. Evidence shows it to be effective in improving mental wellbeing of members in the community. It is unknown how effective this approach is in improving mental wellbeing when applied to training healthcare staff. This study aims to explore perceptions of JL training amongst a variety of health professionals and how JL can be utilised to improve mental health and wellbeing in a health care context. Methods: We employed qualitative methodology, gathering data through semi-structured interviews with healthcare workers who had undergone JL training in Westminster. We analysed 17 semi-structured interviews with a broad range of staff who had undergone training several months prior. We used self-determination theory and transformational learning theory as guiding conceptual frameworks. In addition, we applied thematic analysis to post-course feedback gathered from participants to explore if views of the training differ between the time of the training (post course feedback) and several months later when the interviews were carried out. Analysis was conducted using Nvivo 14. Results: The study revealed five key themes: the power of listening, shifting perspectives, empowerment and professional development, enhanced work relationships and implementation. Themes across the immediate post-training feedback and structured interviews overlapped. Participants reported that JL training improved team and client relationships as well as their personal lives, leading to improved mental wellbeing. However, system constraints were identified as a challenge, emphasizing the need for support from senior management and policymakers to further enable its use. Discussion: This was the first study to evaluate JL in the United Kingdom and in a healthcare setting. Our findings show that there was an overwhelming impression of positive impact of the training on the professional and personal lives of healthcare staff. This study contributes to the growing body of knowledge on mental health interventions for healthcare professionals, providing evidence that can inform future practices and policies. JL presents a viable model to improve staff wellbeing. Our findings reinforce growing calls for a culture shift towards human connection.

Indexed as

health workersJust Listeningmental healthmental health trainingwellbeing

Identifiers

PMID40873512
PMCPMC12378978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.