Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40873498›Full record

ArticleNature and science of sleep2025

Can the Sun Prevent Weekend Sleep Advance After Early Weekday Wakeups?

Arcady A Putilov, Evgeniy G Verevkin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature and science of sleep, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Arcady A Putilov *Independent Research Group, Biomedical Systems Math-Modeling, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2779-9046
Evgeniy G Verevkin *Independent Research Group, Biomedical Systems Math-Modeling, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2877-1846

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: There is sparse evidence on how circadian sleep timing is affected by 5 days on/2 days off school/work schedule. In an in silico study, we applied a model of sleep-wake regulation to highlight the difference in predictions based on two alternative explanations proposing either sun time or social time (eg, either solar midday or weekday risetime) as the major contributor to light entrainment of sleep timing. Self-reported sleep times were then used to confirm these predictions. Methods: The difference between earlier and later weekday risers in weekend sleep timing their difference in weekday risetime were compared. This difference in weekday risetime is equal to the sum of differences in sleep phase shift on weekends and sleep loss on weekdays measured as the differences in weekend risetime and weekend-weekday gap in risetime, respectively. Three sets of samples were used for these estimations: 87 and 100 paired samples obtained before vs during lockdown and during early vs later school start time (five and three age subsets, respectively) and 1250 vs 1192 unpaired samples with weekday risetime not earlier vs later than 7 a.m. (five age subsets). Results: In any age subset, a shift in social time (weekday risetime) caused a shift in weekend sleep phase (weekend risetime) due to a shift in the 24-h pattern of exposure to light, but this sleep phase shift was less pronounced than the shift in social time. Conclusion: Both social time and sun time substantially contribute to the light entrainment of circadian sleep timing.

Indexed as

lockdownschool start timesleep durationsleep timingsleep-wake regulating processes

Identifiers

PMID40873498
PMCPMC12380101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.