ArticleBio-protocol2025
Rapid Isolation and Flow Cytometry Analysis of Murine Intestinal Immune Cells After Chemically Induced Colitis.
Article in Bio-protocol, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Refinement of renal T lymphocytes enrichment strategies: advancing the in-depth study of renal immune responses.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Oral FPR2/ALX modulators tune myeloid cell activity to ameliorate mucosal inflammation in inflammatory bowel disease.Acta pharmacologica Sinica · 2025Article
- Neutrophils in inflammatory bowel disease: disease-promoting versus protective functions.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Efficient enzyme-free method to assess the development and maturation of the innate and adaptive immune systems in the mouse colon.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chemically induced murine colitis models are widely used to understand intestinal homeostasis and inflammatory responses during acute and chronic gut inflammation, such as inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Resident populations of immune cells, together with those recruited during an inflammatory response, maintain intestinal immunity by mounting an effective immune response to enteropathogenic microbes while at the same time maintaining tolerance against commensals. To better understand the disease mechanism, studying different immune cell populations and their dynamic changes during infection and inflammation is essential. However, isolating healthy and viable immune populations, particularly hyperactivated neutrophils and macrophages from the inflamed gut (i.e., active disease site), is challenging as tissues are usually subjected to rigorous enzymatic digestion for an extended period. Here, we describe a method that uses a cell dissociator (Medimachine II from Syntec International) to separate intestinal tissue after short enzymatic digestion to obtain a single-cell suspension. This technique facilitates the isolation of immune cells from mouse intestinal tissues in high quantity and with superior viability in a very short time frame. This protocol delivers 80%-90% cell viability, which is 1.5 to 2-fold higher than conventional methods of isolating cells from inflamed mouse colons. The composition, phenotype, activation state, and gene expression profile of cells isolated using this protocol can be assessed by using multiple methods, including, but not limited to, flow cytometry, quantitative PCR, immunoblotting, mass spectrometry, single-cell RNA sequencing, and functional readouts such as reactive oxygen species (ROS) production. Key features • Infiltrating immune cells are key drivers of intestinal inflammation. • Isolating viable cells from the inflamed colon is slow and may alter cell activation and expression profiles. • This protocol enables faster isolation with improved cell viability. • Isolated cells can be further purified using magnetic beads or flow cytometry for downstream analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.