ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2025
Investigating the impact of an efficacy-based nursing program integrated with nutritional intervention strategies on the outcomes of multiple myeloma patients with renal failure.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Pathophysiology, evaluation, and management of malnutrition in hematologic malignancies: a comprehensive review.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To explore the effect of nursing scheme based on efficacy theory combined with nutritional intervention on patients with multiple myeloma (MM) complicated with renal failure. Methods: Ninety-two patients with MM complicated with renal failure in our hospital from April 2022 to April 2024 were randomly divided into control group (46 cases, using conventional nursing) and observation group (46 cases, using nursing scheme based on efficacy theory combined with nutritional intervention). The CDSES score of self-efficacy, CD-RISC score of resilience, CFS score of cancer-related fatigue, nutrition related indicators (ALB, Hb, PA) and FLIC score of quality of life were compared between the two groups. Results: After the intervention, both groups showed increased CDSES and CD-RISC scores, with the observation group significantly higher than controls. And the levels of ALB, Hb and PA in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group. Cancer fatigue scale (CFS) scores at T1, T2, and T3 were reduced from baseline (T0) in both groups; and the observation group was significantly lower than the control group. After the intervention, the scores of the four dimensions of good body and ability, good psychology, difficulties caused by cancer and good society of the two groups were significantly improved, and the scores of the observation group were higher than those of the control group; The scores of nausea dimension in the two groups were significantly lower than those before the intervention, and the control group decreased more than the observation group ( Conclusion: The efficacy theory-based nursing plan combined with nutritional intervention benefits MM patients with renal failure. It improves self-efficacy and psychological resilience, reduces cancer-related fatigue, and enhances nutritional status and overall quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.