ReviewFrontiers in nutrition2025
Exploring the impact of artificial sweeteners on diabetes management and glycemic control.
Review in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Steviol Glycosides (E960) FromFood science & nutrition · 2026Review
- Isoniazid-Saccharin Salts: Synthesis, Structural Aspects, Thermal Properties and Spectroscopic Characterization.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Stevia-derived sweeteners in reduced-sugar foods: formulation strategies, sensory optimization, nutritional evidence, and safety perspectives.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Review
- Sucralose Exposure During Pregnancy Elevates Gestational Diabetes Risk via Gut Microbiota-Metabolic Axis in Mice.Journal of diabetes research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diabetes mellitus (DM), a chronic metabolic disorder characterized by impaired glucose metabolism, has emerged as a significant global health challenge. Effective management of diabetes encompasses not only medical interventions but also lifestyle and dietary modifications. Artificial sweeteners (ASs), due to their low caloric content and minimal impact on blood glucose levels, offer promising potential as sugar substitutes for individuals aiming to manage glycemic control. Compounds such as aspartame, sucralose, and stevia mimic the sweetness of sugar without causing hyperglycemia, making them suitable for diabetic patients. This chapter explores the role of ASs in diabetes management, with a special focus on their mechanisms of action, including modulation of insulin sensitivity and glucose metabolism. An extensive review of preclinical and clinical studies evaluates the efficacy, safety, and long-term effects of ASs in glycemic control, highlighting their ability to reduce caloric intake, promote satiety, and support glycemic control and insulin sensitivity in individuals with diabetes. Emerging evidence suggests that ASs may influence gut microbiota, potentially affecting metabolic outcomes and insulin sensitivity, thus presenting opportunities for personalized interventions. Despite their benefits, awareness of potential risks, such as altered taste perception and over-reliance on ASs, is crucial. Integrating ASs within a broader lifestyle approach, comprising regular exercise and balanced nutrition, ensures optimal outcomes in diabetes management. This chapter emphasizes the importance of precision medicine in tailoring AS use to individual metabolic responses, underscoring its role as an adjunct to comprehensive diabetes care strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.