ArticleGlobal health action2025
Insights to optimizing health extension workers' time use and efficiency in Ethiopia: a qualitative study.
Article in Global health action, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Health Extension Program (HEP) is Ethiopia's flagship program introduced in 2003 to ensure equitable access to primary healthcare services. Recently, inefficiency in the time use patterns of staff of the HEP, including absenteeism and non-productive engagements, has been reported as a major challenge.
objectiveThis qualitative study explored what factors influenced their time use and efficiency.
methodsThis is a qualitative study that was conducted in rural health posts (HPs) across Ethiopia in three rounds over a period of 12 months (17 May 2023 to 16 May 2024). Qualitative data were collected through key informant interviews (KIIs), in-depth interviews (IDIs), and focus group discussions (FGDs) involving HEWs and other staffs of health posts, their supervisors, Kebele leaders, Women's Development Army (WDA), teachers, and other community members. A total of 52 KIIs, 31 IDIs, and 28 FGDs were conducted in three rounds. Data were analyzed using ATLAS.ti 7.1.18 software.
resultsHEWs commonly spent their time on productive non health or non-HEP activities such as those related to community-based health insurance, agricultural and rural development and education sectors, and other political assignments. It was also noted that HEWs could be available in their workplace, but might not be productive. Factors for the inefficiencies across HPs often pertained to environmental and demographic features, community trust and engagement, local administration; human resource development and management practices, multisectoral collaboration; and underlying causes of absenteeism including motivation.
conclusionInefficiencies are common among HEWs. Strategies need to be devised focusing on the identified modifiable factors such as improving accountability and performance management practices, introducing incentive mechanisms to keep HEWs motivated, improving accessibility to transportation services, and security conditions, workforce to population size ratio; and capacity building.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.