Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40873378›Full record

ArticleKorean journal of radiology2025

Artificial Intelligence Analysis of Chest Radiographs for Predicting Major Adverse Events in Patients Visiting the Emergency Department With Acute Cardiopulmonary Symptoms.

Chanyoung Rhee, Ki Jeong Hong, Ki Hong Kim, Jin Mo Goo, Eui Jin Hwang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Korean journal of radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Chanyoung RheeDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8478-2446
Ki Jeong HongDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3334-817X
Ki Hong KimDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2115-0078
Jin Mo GooDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1791-7942
Eui Jin HwangDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. ken921004@hotmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3697-5542

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIn this study, we investigated whether artificial intelligence (AI) analysis of chest radiographs (CXRs) can predict major adverse clinical events in patients visiting the emergency department (ED) with acute cardiopulmonary symptoms. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis secondary analysis of a previous clinical trial included patients who visited the ED with symptoms suggestive of acute cardiopulmonary disease and underwent chest radiography between June 2020 and December 2021. All patients underwent triage upon arrival at ED according to the Korean Triage and Acuity Scale (KTAS). The CXRs were retrospectively analyzed using a commercial AI (Lunit INSIGHT CXR, version 3.1.4.1) capable of detecting seven abnormalities on a single frontal CXR. The predictive performance of the AI analysis for major adverse cardiopulmonary events (any among hospitalization, ED revisits, and death in the ED due to acute cardiopulmonary disease) was compared with that of the KTAS using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Multivariable (the AI analysis result and KTAS level) logistic regression analysis was conducted to investigate whether the AI analysis result was an independent predictor of the events and whether the combination of the AI analysis and KTAS has additional merit.

resultsAmong 3576 patients (1966 males; mean age, 64 years), 1148 (32.1%) experienced major adverse cardiopulmonary events. AI analysis of CXRs outperformed the KTAS in predicting these events (AUC, 0.795 vs. 0.610;

conclusionAI analysis of CXRs showed greater accuracy than the KTAS did in predicting major adverse cardiopulmonary events in patients visiting the ED with acute cardiopulmonary symptoms. AI analysis may enhance the efficacy of patient triage in the ED.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceHeart DiseasesLung DiseasesRadiography, ThoracicAcute DiseaseAgedEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsRetrospective StudiesTriageArtificial intelligenceChest radiographyEmergency departmentKoreanTriage

Identifiers

PMID40873378
PMCPMC12394822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.