ArticleKorean journal of radiology2025
Development of a Deep-Learning Model for Estimating Newborn Gestational Age via Lumbar Vertebral Segmentation on Plain Radiography.
Article in Korean journal of radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Radiology Research and Publishing Across 2025-2026: Perspectives FromKorean journal of radiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo develop a deep learning model for estimating newborn gestational age (GA) based on the shape of the lumbar vertebral bodies on cross-table lateral radiographs obtained on the first day after birth. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis retrospective study included 423 cross-table lateral radiographs of 423 newborns (242 boys and 181 girls) taken within 24 hours after birth at two hospitals. Of these, 256 radiographs (157 boys and 99 girls) obtained from one institution were used for model development, and 167 radiographs (85 boys and 82 girls) from the other institution were used for model external testing. Clinical data, including medical history of underlying disorders, GA determined by ultrasound parameters, birth date, birth weight, sex, examination date, and reason for requesting radiographs, were obtained. The radiographs underwent manual labeling of the five lumbar vertebral bodies, followed by preprocessing steps such as normalization, resizing, denoising, cropping, and augmentation via horizontal flipping and rotation. Subsequently, we trained a deep learning model using a DeepLabv3+ network with a ResNet50 backbone for lumbar segmentation and used a customized AgeClassifier model with two parallel ResNet18 backbones for GA estimation. Model performance was evaluated using an external test dataset after image cropping.
resultsNeither GA nor birth weight differed significantly between boys and girls. In the segmentation model, the mean dice similarity coefficient ± standard deviation (SD) was 0.801 ± 0.031. For GA estimation, the mean absolute error ± SD was 5.2 ± 0.5 days. The Bland-Altman bias (AI-estimated GA - ground truth GA) and 95% limits of agreement were -0.4 days and -13.0 to 12.3 days, respectively.
conclusionOur deep learning model showed promising performance in lumbar vertebral body segmentation and GA estimation using plain radiographs, suggesting its potential utility as a supportive tool for neonatal maturity assessment in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.