ReviewCurrent drug research reviews2026
Navigating Global Regulatory Divergence in Over-the-counter Drugs: Addressing Emerging Risks and Harmonization Challenges.
Review in Current drug research reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The worldwide market for over-the-counter (OTC) medications is quickly developing, providing consumers with increased self-medication options while facing substantial regulatory issues due to varied approval procedures, labeling regulations, and safety standards between nations. Despite efforts to standardize regulatory frameworks, differences in component classification, dosage limitations, and risk assessment standards impede producers, healthcare professionals, and lawmakers. This analysis looks at the regulatory environment of over-thecounter pharmaceuticals in major countries, including the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the European Medicines Agency (EMA), and regulatory organizations in Asia- Pacific and developing economies, highlighting notable disparities in approval procedures, marketing authorization, and pharmacovigilance. Consumer safety is one of the most important problems in regulatory divergence, since differences in authorized active ingredients, warnings, and recalls can lead to abuse, adverse medication responses, and cross-border product availability anomalies. Furthermore, the lack of standardized testing and quality control procedures hampers international trade and public health policy. Emerging threats, such as antimicrobial resistance (AMR), counterfeit OTC goods, and digital health breakthroughs, necessitate a more integrated and adaptable global regulatory framework. This assessment also looks at continuing harmonization efforts by organizations such as the International Council for Harmonization (ICH) and the World Health Organization (WHO), as well as best practices for expediting global regulatory procedures. Addressing regulatory divergence with data-driven decision-making, digital pharmacovigilance, and risk-based categorization frameworks can help enhance consumer safety, market efficiency, and public health outcomes. The future of over-the-counter medication regulation lies in collaborative policymaking, real-time safety monitoring, and rapid adaptability to changing healthcare concerns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40873366What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.