ReviewCurrent neuropharmacology2026
Pharmacodynamics and Pharmacokinetics of Ublituximab Compared with Other Anti-CD20 Monoclonal Antibodies for Multiple Sclerosis Treatment.
Review in Current neuropharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Subcutaneous ofatumumab for remission maintenance in pediatric idiopathic nephrotic syndrome: a case series.Clinical kidney journal · 2026Article
- Smoldering neuroinflammation in progressive multiple sclerosis: mechanisms, imaging biomarkers, and therapeutic opportunities.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Efficacy and safety of ublituximab for relapsing multiple sclerosis patients: current evidence and expert opinion.Journal of neurology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The therapeutic scenario for multiple sclerosis (MS) has expanded rapidly over the last few years. Among the available treatments, anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies, including rituximab, ocrelizumab, ofatumumab, and ublituximab, have shown significant results in reducing disease activity and slowing progression, particularly in relapsing MS. The distinct mechanisms of action, including the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles as well as the immunogenicity of these drugs, require careful consideration to tailor treatment for individual patients. A comprehensive review of the literature was conducted by searching PubMed and evaluating key studies, trials, and congress abstracts related to the use of anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies. The analysis focused on the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles, as well as the immunogenicity, of anti-CD20 therapies currently available, with particular emphasis on the recently approved ublituximab. Ocrelizumab is effective in both relapsing-remitting and primary-progressive MS, using antibodydependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) as its primary mechanism of action, with intravenous and subcutaneous administration options ensuring flexible treatment delivery. Ofatumumab depletes B-cells through enhanced complement-dependent cytotoxicity, offering convenient monthly subcutaneous self-administration. Ublituximab's unique glycoengineered fragment crystallizable region enhances ADCC, resulting in rapid B-cell depletion and potentially improving its safety profile. Ublituximab allows for a shorter infusion time without requiring post-infusion monitoring after the second dose, provided there have been no prior reactions. Understanding the characteristics of different anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies is critical for optimizing treatment, enhancing patient outcomes, and minimizing treatment burden. Ublituximab represents a promising option, offering a shorter infusion time and higher ADCC activity, which complements existing treatments such as ocrelizumab and ofatumumab.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.