ArticleThe Permanente journal2025
Total Payments and Out-of-Pocket Expenses for Surgical Hand Trauma Episodes.
Article in The Permanente journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeInsight about episode spending after elective procedures has driven interest in bundling reimbursement for surgical procedures. However, little is known about episode spending for health systems (payments) and patients (out-of-pocket [OOP] expenses) after unplanned, nonelective procedures such as hand trauma.
methodsThe authors used 2019-2022 national claims to conduct a cohort study of patients undergoing flexor tendon repair, open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) of a distal radius fracture, and replantation/revascularization. The authors constructed 90-day episodes spanning surgical procedures and postoperative care. The authors calculated episode spending from the perspectives of the health system (payments) and patients (OOP expenses). Multivariable regression models were used to examine the association between patient characteristics and spending.
resultsAmong 21,753 patients, 90-day postoperative spending varied by procedure type. Median payment was $14,263 for ORIF of distal radius fractures, $11,541 for flexor tendon repairs, and $25,700 for revascularization/replantation. Compared to ORIF of distal radius fractures, flexor tendon repairs were associated with 18% lower payments (cost ratio, 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.80-0.83), while revascularization/replantation was associated with 7% lower payments (cost ratio, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.90-0.97). Patients with at least one comorbidity had 4% greater payments compared to patients with no comorbidities (cost ratio, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.03-1.06). However, inpatient procedures were 388% more expensive than outpatient procedures (cost ratio, 3.77; 95% CI, 3.77-3.99). The authors also found variation in patient OOP expenses based on procedure type.
conclusionsThere was heterogeneity in health system and patient spending after hand trauma due to procedure type. This highlighted that any future payment or practice redesign for hand trauma episodes should be stratified by procedure type.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.