Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40873154›Full record

SynthesisJournal of clinical periodontology2025

Do Systemic Antibiotics Offer Benefits to the Surgical Treatment of Peri-Implantitis? A Systematic Review With Meta-Analyses.

Georgios N Antonoglou, Spyridon N Papageorgiou, Ana Carrillo de Albornoz, Michael Payer, Andreas Stavropoulos

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of clinical periodontology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Synergistic potential of antibiotics against anFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Georgios N AntonoglouPeriodontology Unit, Centre for Host Microbiome Interactions, Faculty of Dentistry, Oral and Craniofacial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8254-5471
Spyridon N PapageorgiouClinic of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, Center for Dental Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-1968-3326
Ana Carrillo de AlbornozEtiology and Therapy of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases (ETEP) Research Group, Faculty of Dentistry, University Complutense of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Michael PayerDepartment of Oral Surgery and Orthodontics, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-4469-8335
Andreas StavropoulosPeriodontology, Faculty of Odontology, University of Malmö, Malmö, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-8161-3754

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo assess the potential benefit of using adjunct systemic antibiotics in surgical peri-implantitis treatment. MATERIALS AND

methodsSix databases were searched (December 2024) for randomised/non-randomised clinical studies. After duplicate study selection, data extraction and risk-of-bias assessment, random-effects meta-analyses of odds ratios (ORs) or mean differences (MDs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were performed, followed by the analysis of certainty of evidence.

resultsSeven studies (three randomised and four non-randomised, comprising 595 patients and 1388 implants) were included. Systemic antibiotics were associated with greater short-term treatment success (n = 5; OR = 2.33; 95% CI: 1.29-4.21), bone gain (n = 4; MD = 0.37 mm; 95% CI: -0.68 to -0.07), increased bone level stability (n = 3; OR = 2.73; 95% CI: 1.50-4.99), reduced bleeding on probing (n = 6; OR = 0.49; 95% CI: 0.31-0.78), reduced suppuration on probing (n = 3; OR = 0.33; 95% CI: 0.18-0.61) and increased gingival recession (n = 3; MD = 0.18 mm; 95% CI: 0-0.36 mm) (p < 0.05). Systemic antibiotics seem to benefit only implants with modified surfaces (ORs: modified 4.10 vs. turned 0.79), and event that, without long-term benefits (≥ 3 years). Finally, one trial found that antibiotics probably increased diarrhoea risk.

conclusionsEvidence from randomised/non-randomised studies seems to indicate that systemic antibiotics benefit surgical peri-implantitis treatment, in the short term (1-2 years), especially for implants with a modified surface, while data on adverse effects is scarce. No substantial long-term benefits are seen (≥ 3 years). Uncertainty still exists regarding the potential benefit of systemic antibiotics as adjunct to surgical management of peri-implantitis.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsPeri-ImplantitisHumansTreatment OutcomeAnti-Bacterial Agentsclinical trialsmeta‐analysisperi‐implantitisperiodontal diseasepocket probing depthsurgical periodontal treatmentsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID40873154
PMCPMC12605830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.