Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40873126›Full record

ReviewJournal of animal science2025

Leveraging data from commercial cattle for genetic improvement- an international perspective.

Matthew L Spangler, Donagh P Berry, Larry A Kuehn

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of animal science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Matthew L SpanglerDepartment of Animal Science, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, 68583, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5184-501X
Donagh P BerryDepartment of Animal BioScience, Animal & Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Teagasc, Moorepark, Fermoy, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-4349-1447
Larry A KuehnGenetics and Animal Breeding Unit, Roman L. Hruska U.S. Meat and Animal Research Center, Clay Center, NE, 68933, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7573-5365

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic evaluations are predicated on routine access to large quantities of data on a range of performance traits from individual animals, their genetic relationships, as well as data on factors other than additive genetic merit that influence phenotypic performance. Based on the well-established breeding pyramid, far more commercial animals generally exist relative to seedstock animals. Despite this, performance data from commercial animals is not always used in genetic evaluations. These data are not utilized for many reasons such as 1) no individual animal data actually exists or is recorded in a useful format from commercial animals, 2) no ancestry is recorded, 3) systematic environmental effects are not recorded, 4) infrastructure is not in place to collate such data, and 5) issues relating to data ownership, governance, and use. Given the end customer of elite germplasm is the commercial producer, systems that only consider seedstock data in the genetic evaluations are sub-optimal for several reasons: 1) assumes a genetic correlation of one between performance in seedstock herds and performance in commercial settings, 2) fails to benefit from additional (commercial) data to increase the accuracy of selection, 3) omits data for traits that are profit drivers for commercial enterprises, and 4) misses an opportunity to provide commercial producers with genetic-based management tools. Two contrasting case studies relating to beef genetic evaluations are explored: 1) US where generally only data from seedstock animals are used and many different genetic evaluations and breeding objectives exist for the multitude of breeds, and 2) Ireland which has a national database of all bovines and uses data from both seedstock and commercial producers to generate multi-breed genetic evaluations which are then applied to and disseminated to all bovines in the country both as breeding and management support indexes.

Indexed as

Animal HusbandryBreedingCattleRed MeatAnimalsGenetic VariationInternationalityLife History Traitsbeef cattlecommercial datagenetic evaluation

Identifiers

PMID40873126
PMCPMC12448394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.