ArticleJournal of forensic sciences2026
Indoor cats scavenging behind closed doors.
Article in Journal of forensic sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Indoor cats scavenging behind closed doors.Journal of forensic sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We report a rare case of postmortem scavenging by cats in Japan involving the skeletonized remains of a woman in her 80s discovered in a locked, garbage-filled room. The body was missing many bones, including vertebrae other than the atlas with odontoid process. The remaining bones were extensively damaged, with destruction of the zygomatic arches, mastoid processes, vertebral facets of the atlas (C1), and epiphyses of the long bones. The bones showed distinctive features such as punctures, denticulated edges, and narrow grooves, consistent with felid dentition. Notably, the damage extended beyond soft tissue consumption, indicating scavenging behavior likely driven by extreme starvation. No evidence of scavenging by canines or rodents was observed, and this case highlights the forensic challenges in identifying postmortem scavengers. This is a well-documented, yet extreme, case of scavenging by cats causing extensive bone destruction. These findings provide valuable insight for future investigations with a long death-postmortem interval and advanced decomposition in domestic environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.