ReviewVaccines2025
Decrypting the Immune Symphony for RNA Vaccines.
Review in Vaccines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Targeted delivery of mRNA to immune cells forDrug delivery · 2026Review
- Pharmaceutical design of mRNA vaccines for endemic infectious diseases: integrating antigen discovery with platform engineering.Clinical and experimental vaccine research · 2026Review
- A single-dose mRNA vaccine induces potent and long-lasting humoral and cellular immunity against the varicella-zoster virus in a murine model.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- mRNA cancer vaccines: delivery strategies, immune modulation, and clinical translation.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- From Jenner to genomics: the unfolding future of vaccinology.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- mRNA-Based Neoantigen Vaccines in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC)-A Promising Avenue in Cancer Immunotherapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- mRNA vaccines transform personalized lung cancer treatment.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccine technology has revolutionized the field of immunization, offering a non-infectious, non-genome-integrating platform that addresses many limitations of traditional vaccine modalities. Recent advancements in chemical modifications, delivery systems, and manufacturing processes have enhanced the stability, efficacy, and safety of RNA-based therapeutics, expanding their application beyond infectious diseases to include genetic disorders, cancer, and rare diseases. Central to the success of RNA vaccines is their ability to orchestrate a finely tuned immune response, leveraging both innate and adaptive immunity to achieve robust and durable protection. This review synthesizes current knowledge on the immunological mechanisms underpinning RNA vaccine efficacy, with a focus on the roles of pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) such as Toll-like receptors (TLRs) and RIG-I-like receptors (RLRs) in sensing exogenous RNA, the impact of RNA modifications and manufacturing impurities on innate immune activation, and the subsequent cytokine and chemokine milieu that shapes adaptive responses. We also discuss the dual role of lipid nanoparticle (LNP) delivery systems as both carriers and adjuvants, highlighting their contribution to the vaccine's immunogenicity and reactogenicity profile. Understanding these complex immune interactions is critical for optimizing RNA vaccine design, minimizing adverse effects, and expanding their therapeutic potential. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the immune symphony orchestrated by RNA vaccines and to identify key areas for future research to further refine and expand the utility of this transformative technology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.