Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40872900›Full record

ArticleVaccines2025

Vaccine Attitudes, Knowledge, and Confidence Among Nursing, Pediatric Nursing, and Midwifery Undergraduate Students in Italy.

Ersilia Buonomo, Daniele Di Giovanni, Gaia Piunno, Stefania Moramarco, Giuliana D'Elpidio, Ercole Vellone, Enkeleda Gjini, Mariachiara Carestia, Cristiana Ferrari, Luca Coppeta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ersilia BuonomoDepartment of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", 00133 Rome, Italy.
Daniele Di GiovanniDepartment of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", 00133 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6772-2310
Gaia PiunnoDepartment of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", 00133 Rome, Italy.
Stefania MoramarcoDepartment of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", 00133 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6192-8775
Giuliana D'ElpidioPediatric Nursing School, Bambino Gesù Children Hospital IRCCS, 00163 Rome, Italy.
Ercole VelloneDepartment of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", 00133 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4673-7473
Enkeleda GjiniFaculty of Medicine, Catholic University of "Our Lady of Good Counsel", 1000 Tirane, Albania.
Mariachiara CarestiaDepartment of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", 00133 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7811-5201
Cristiana FerrariDepartment of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", 00133 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2292-3338
Luca CoppetaDepartment of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", 00133 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2470-6107

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVaccine hesitancy (VH) represents a growing concern among healthcare professionals and students, potentially undermining public health efforts. Nursing, pediatric nursing, and midwifery students are future vaccinators and educators, making it essential to understand their attitudes, knowledge, and confidence toward vaccination. This study aims to assess vaccine-related perceptions and behaviors among these student populations in an Italian university.

methodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted between November 2022 and February 2024 at the University of Rome "Tor Vergata". A structured, anonymous questionnaire, including the Vaccination Attitudes Examination (VAX) scale, vaccine knowledge items, and sources of information, was administered to students in nursing (

resultsAmong the 272 participants, 20.6% reported refusing at least one recommended vaccine, and 18.4% delayed vaccination for non-medical reasons. Vaccine knowledge and confidence increased significantly with academic progression (

conclusionsDespite high COVID-19 vaccine uptake, VH persists among health professional students. Discipline-specific patterns highlight the need for early, targeted educational strategies to enhance vaccine literacy and reduce hesitancy. Tailored training may empower future professionals to become informed and credible advocates for vaccination.

Indexed as

COVID-19 vaccinationhealthcare studentshealth educationmidwiferynursing studentspediatric nursingvaccine confidencevaccine hesitancyvaccine literacy

Identifiers

PMID40872900
PMCPMC12390287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.