Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40872880›Full record

ArticleVaccines2025

The Platform Readiness Dashboard: A Tool for Evaluating Vaccine Platform Suitability for a Rapid Response to Epidemic and Pandemic Threats.

Ramin Sabet-Azad, Catherine Hoath, Nicole Bézay, Anna Särnefält

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ramin Sabet-AzadThe Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations, Askekroken 11, 0277 Oslo, Norway.
Catherine HoathThe Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations, Askekroken 11, 0277 Oslo, Norway.
Nicole BézayThe Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations, Askekroken 11, 0277 Oslo, Norway.
Anna SärnefältThe Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations, Askekroken 11, 0277 Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-0421-9061

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rapid vaccine availability is essential for effective epidemic and pandemic response. Building on the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI) 100 Days Mission, which aims to have new vaccines ready for initial authorization and manufacturing at scale within 100 days of recognition of a pandemic pathogen, the CEPI has developed a Chemistry, Manufacturing and Controls (CMC) Rapid Response Framework to define technical and logistical CMC requirements to enable rapid vaccine availability. Central to this framework is the availability of adaptable vaccine platforms that can be readily tailored to emerging pathogens. To support strategic decision-making and identify gaps in platform capabilities, CEPI has created the Platform Readiness Dashboard. This tool provides a structured, multi-dimensional initial assessment of platform maturity across six key categories: Adaptability, Compatibility, Suitability, Regulatory, Manufacturing, and Facility Readiness. Each category includes specific technical and operational considerations scored using a color-coded system to reflect outbreak response readiness level. This Dashboard aims to enable vaccine developers, manufacturers, funders, and outbreak response teams to evaluate platform strengths and limitations at any given time, informing funding, preparedness and response activities. By offering a dynamic view of essential platform readiness indicators, the dashboard can communicate progress supporting faster responses to future health emergencies.

Indexed as

100 Days Missionoutbreak responsepandemic preparednessplatform readinessvaccine platform

Identifiers

PMID40872880
PMCPMC12389911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.