ArticleViruses2025
Isolation of New Chemical Modulators of the Interaction Between HIV-1 Integrase and the Cellular Restriction Factor GCN2.
Article in Viruses, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Integrase is a key protein during HIV-1 replication as it catalyzes the integration of viral DNA into the host DNA. After several decades of research, highly potent and selective active site inhibitors have emerged. The new challenge is now to develop molecules with an original mode of action, targeting integrase out of its catalytic site. During a previous study, we developed an in vitro assay to monitor the interaction between HIV-1 integrase and one of its cellular partners, GCN2. This AlphaLISA-based assay was validated as a platform for chemical modulator screening. In the present study, we used a library of natural products from the Developmental Therapeutics Program (NIH) to identify novel chemical leads. The best modulators were characterized and a structure-activity relationship study was initiated with a limited number of derivatives. We found that most inhibitors were tricylic or tetraclyclic molecules, with the most potent belonging to the anthracyclines/anthraquinones. Of note, several molecules exhibited interesting cellular activities and may be suitable for further optimization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.