ReviewViruses2025
Effects of Primary Viruses (PCV2, PPV1, and PRRSV) Involved in Porcine Reproductive Failure as Mono- and Coinfections with Each Other and with Emerging Viruses (PCV3 and nPPVs).
Review in Viruses, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Establishment of an Indirect ELISA Detection Method for Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus NSP10.Veterinary sciences · 2026Article
- Safety and reproductive performance in sows after vaccination: a randomized controlled trial.Veterinary research communications · 2026Article
- Research Progress of GP4 Protein of Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus.Veterinary sciences · 2026Review
- Isolation and complete genome analysis of Porcine Parvovirus 1 from swine with reproductive failure in southern India.Archives of microbiology · 2026Article
- Molecular Detection and Phylogenetic Analysis of Selected Viral Pathogens in Wild Boar Populations of Russia.Viruses · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Porcine reproductive failure (PRF) is a complex that affects reproductive parameters, leading to significant economic losses for intensive swine farms worldwide. The causes of PRF involve multiple infectious agents, classified into two main groups: primary or putative viruses, which include PCV2, PPV1, and PRRSV, and secondary or occasional viruses, such as PCV3, PCV4, and the new parvoviruses (nPPVs, PPV2 through PPV8). This review provides an updated overview of both viral groups, detailing their unique characteristics and the most commonly reported clinical signs and lesions linked to the putative viruses. While the impact of primary viruses on PRF is well established, the role of secondary viruses in PRF is still under investigation. PCV3 has been directly associated with PRF, characterized by proposed histopathological lesions. Although PCV4 has been identified in reproductive samples, its role in PRF remains unclear. Additionally, nPPVs have been found in reproductive tissues; however, a clear causal relationship with PRF has not been established. The sporadic presence of nPPVs raises questions about their direct impact on PRF and whether they may have synergistic effects when combined with other viruses. This review highlights the growing importance of viral coinfections in the context of PRF. To date, the most frequently reported coinfections are PCV2/PRRSV and PCV2/PPV1, along with emerging pairings such as PCV2/PCV3 and combinations of these two PCVs with nPPVs. Based on the existing literature and our recent findings, we propose a subclinical presentation of PRF, characterized by the presence of both primary and secondary viruses in asymptomatic sows with low viral loads. Furthermore, the synergistic effects of these viruses could contribute to a clinical form of the disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.