ArticleVeterinary sciences2025
Developing and Evaluating a Digital Pathology Platform for Veterinary Students: A Case Study in Romania.
Article in Veterinary sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Impact of Cost-Effective Digital Slide Platform on Grades of Romanian Veterinary Students.Veterinary sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This paper reports on the development and implementation of a digital pathology platform aimed at improving veterinary students' learning experiences. Traditional pathology labs limit individual access to physical slides, restricting independent study and detailed examination. The platform provides on-demand access to a comprehensive library of high-resolution digital slides, enabling flexible and personalized learning. Using a mixed-method approach, including surveys and usage analytics, we evaluated its impact on student outcomes. Results showed a significant increase in student engagement and satisfaction, with median usefulness ratings of 5 on a 5-point scale. Usage data indicated enhanced study habits, including increased incidence of students reviewing digital slides independently compared to traditional methods. Qualitative feedback highlighted the platform's high-resolution imaging and zoom functionality as key features improving students' understanding of histopathological details. Minor challenges during digitization were addressed to optimize accessibility and interactivity. Overall, this digital platform supports the development of essential diagnostic skills and aligns with contemporary veterinary education skills. The findings demonstrate that integrating digital pathology resources can effectively complement conventional teaching, fostering deeper learning and greater flexibility in study practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.