ReviewVeterinary sciences2025
Topical Use of Sucralfate in Cutaneous Wound Management: A Narrative Review with a Veterinary Perspective.
Review in Veterinary sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Wound management is a fundamental skill for veterinarians, requiring a systematic approach to wound care and a deep understanding of the biological principles underlying healing. Sucralfate, widely known as a mucoprotective agent for gastroduodenal ulcers, has recently shown promising topical effects in human skin lesions by binding and protecting growth factors from proteolytic degradation, thereby enhancing their local availability. This action promotes angiogenesis, chemotaxis and cell proliferation, while reducing oxidative stress and exerting bacteriostatic and bactericidal effects against common pathogens. However, the veterinary-specific literature on topical sucralfate is extremely limited, with most available data derived from experimental studies in rodent and porcine models, rather than clinical studies in common veterinary species. Nonetheless, these preliminary studies suggest a potential role for sucralfate in accelerating the healing process through improved collagen synthesis, neovascularization and fibroblast activity. Given the species-specific challenges in veterinary wound healing-especially in horses and cats, prone to delayed healing and exuberant granulation tissue-sucralfate represents a promising, cost-effective and safe candidate for clinical use. This narrative review synthetizes current evidence on sucralfate's mechanisms and therapeutic benefits across human and veterinary contexts, highlighting the need for controlled, multidisciplinary veterinary studies. Validating sucralfate's efficacy in clinical settings could enable the growing owner demand for advanced care to be satisfied, shorten recovery times, reduce complications and improve animal welfare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.