Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40872703›Full record

ArticleVeterinary sciences2025

Inflammation and Necrosis Syndrome in Young Piglets-A Longitudinal Study.

Sabrina Becker, Katrin Hindenlang, Josef Kuehling, Mirjam Lechner, Gerald Reiner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Feeding of Undocked Pigs: Effects of Feed Components and Feed Composition.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sabrina BeckerJustus-Liebig-University Giessen, Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Clinic for Swine-Herd Health Management and Molecular Diagnostics, Frankfurter Strasse 112, 35392 Giessen, Germany.
Katrin HindenlangJustus-Liebig-University Giessen, Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Clinic for Swine-Herd Health Management and Molecular Diagnostics, Frankfurter Strasse 112, 35392 Giessen, Germany.
Josef KuehlingJustus-Liebig-University Giessen, Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Clinic for Swine-Herd Health Management and Molecular Diagnostics, Frankfurter Strasse 112, 35392 Giessen, Germany.
Mirjam LechnerUEG Hohenlohe, Am Wasen 20, 91567 Herrieden, Germany.
Gerald ReinerJustus-Liebig-University Giessen, Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Clinic for Swine-Herd Health Management and Molecular Diagnostics, Frankfurter Strasse 112, 35392 Giessen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4284-0345

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Swine Inflammation and Necrosis Syndrome (SINS) is a simple and non-invasive animal-based health and welfare indicator that combines the clinical observation of bristle loss, swelling, redness, exudation, necrosis and haemorrhage in various parts of the body. It provides a point-of-care measure with direct intervention capability. Several studies from different countries demonstrate its considerable prevalence, particularly among newborn, suckling and weaned piglets. The syndrome has been demonstrated to be endogenous, as evidenced by clinical, pathohistological, clinical chemical, metabolomic, transcriptomic and genomic analysis. It has been established that the first and fourth weeks of life represent suitable time points for examination. However, longitudinal follow-up of individual animals has hitherto been lacking. In order to address this issue, a total of 1080 complete SINS examinations were conducted on 59 piglets at days 1 to 14, 19, 22, 26 and 41 of life. The findings substantiate the bimodal progression and evince a robust correlation between signs in disparate anatomical regions, including body temperature. Two peaks with significantly increased SINS signs were observed, the first around the fourth day of life and the second around day 26. The majority of indications of SINS in the second peak manifested prior to the initiation of the weaning process. The development of SINS signs in the piglets as a group followed a clear pattern. However, it was not feasible to predict the subsequent course of SINS based on individual animals. It is recommended that SINS, as an animal-based health and welfare indicator, be screened on days three to four and/or in the fourth week of life. It is imperative that the day of life is specified with the greatest possible precision, given the propensity for considerable deviations to occur within a time frame of one to three days, especially during the initial week of life. The implementation of these findings has the potential to make a decisive contribution to improving inventory herd analyses and studies on SINS, thereby improving the welfare and health of piglets.

Indexed as

animal welfareswine

Identifiers

PMID40872703
PMCPMC12390322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.