Article in Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Mingye HuState Key Laboratory of Bioactive Molecules and Druggability Assessment, International Cooperative Laboratory of Traditional Chinese Medicine Modernization and Innovative Drug Development of Chinese Ministry of Education (MOE) of China, School of Pharmacy, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China.
Shiji ChenState Key Laboratory of Bioactive Molecules and Druggability Assessment, International Cooperative Laboratory of Traditional Chinese Medicine Modernization and Innovative Drug Development of Chinese Ministry of Education (MOE) of China, School of Pharmacy, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China.ORCID 0009-0009-3806-6834
Yumiao ZhenState Key Laboratory of Bioactive Molecules and Druggability Assessment, International Cooperative Laboratory of Traditional Chinese Medicine Modernization and Innovative Drug Development of Chinese Ministry of Education (MOE) of China, School of Pharmacy, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China.
Xin WangState Key Laboratory of Bioactive Molecules and Druggability Assessment, International Cooperative Laboratory of Traditional Chinese Medicine Modernization and Innovative Drug Development of Chinese Ministry of Education (MOE) of China, School of Pharmacy, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China.
Yiwen ZhongState Key Laboratory of Bioactive Molecules and Druggability Assessment, International Cooperative Laboratory of Traditional Chinese Medicine Modernization and Innovative Drug Development of Chinese Ministry of Education (MOE) of China, School of Pharmacy, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China.
Xiaoxu LiangSchool of Arts and Sciences, Guangzhou Maritime University, Guangzhou 510725, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3252-3418
Cheong-Meng ChongState Key Laboratory of Mechanism and Quality of Chinese Medicine, Institute of Chinese Medical Sciences, University of Macau, Macao SAR, China.
Hai-Jing ZhongState Key Laboratory of Bioactive Molecules and Druggability Assessment, International Cooperative Laboratory of Traditional Chinese Medicine Modernization and Innovative Drug Development of Chinese Ministry of Education (MOE) of China, School of Pharmacy, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1247-3150
Funding
Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation 2024A1515010167National Natural Science Foundation of China 82204482
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
SMYD5-BRD4 Interaction Drives Hepatocellular Carcinoma Progression: A Combined in Silico and Experimental Analysis. · full record | OpenQuestion