Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40872464›Full record

ArticleMicromachines2025

A Microfluidic Approach for Assessing the Rheological Properties of Healthy Versus Thalassemic Red Blood Cells.

Hao Jiang, Xueying Li, Zhuoyan Liu, Siyu Luo, Junbin Huang, Chun Chen, Rui Chen, Fenfang Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Micromachines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hao JiangDepartment of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China.
Xueying LiShenzhen Bay Laboratory, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Shenzhen 518107, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4631-9028
Zhuoyan LiuShenzhen Bay Laboratory, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Shenzhen 518107, China.
Siyu LuoShenzhen Bay Laboratory, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Shenzhen 518107, China.
Junbin HuangPediatric Hematology Laboratory, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Shenzhen 518107, China.
Chun ChenPediatric Hematology Laboratory, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Shenzhen 518107, China.
Rui ChenDepartment of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0445-7847
Fenfang LiShenzhen Bay Laboratory, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Shenzhen 518107, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1690-3373

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The deformability of red blood cells (RBCs) is critical for microvascular circulation and is impaired in hematological disorders such as thalassemia, a prevalent public health concern in Guangdong, China. While microfluidics enable high-precision deformability assessment, current studies lack standardization in deformation metrics and rarely investigate post-deformation recovery dynamics. This study introduces an automated microfluidic platform for systematically evaluating RBC deformability in healthy and thalassemic individuals. A biomimetic chip featuring 4 µm, 8 µm, and 16 µm wide channels (7 µm in height) was designed to simulate capillary dimensions, with COMSOL CFD numerical modeling validating shear stress profiles. RBC suspensions (10

Indexed as

deformability assessmentmicrofluidic platformred blood cellsshape recoverythalassemia

Identifiers

PMID40872464
PMCPMC12388591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.