ArticleMicromachines2025
Investigating Surface Morphology and Subsurface Damage Evolution in Nanoscratching of Single-Crystal 4H-SiC.
Article in Micromachines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Stacking-sequence-dependent plasticity and subsurface damage evolution in nanometric cutting of hexagonal SiC.Journal of molecular modeling · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Single-crystal 4H silicon carbide (4H-SiC) is a key substrate material for third-generation semiconductor devices, where surface and subsurface integrity critically affect performance and reliability. This study systematically examined the evolution of surface morphology and subsurface damage (SSD) during nanoscratching of 4H-SiC under varying normal loads (0-100 mN) using a nanoindenter equipped with a diamond Berkovich tip. Scratch characteristics were assessed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), while cross-sectional SSD was characterised via focused ion beam (FIB) slicing and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The results revealed three distinct material removal regimes: ductile removal below 14.5 mN, a brittle-to-ductile transition between 14.5-59.3 mN, and brittle removal above 59.3 mN. Notably, substantial subsurface damage-including median cracks exceeding 4 μm and dislocation clusters-was observed even within the transition zone where the surface appeared smooth. A thin amorphous layer at the indenter-substrate interface suppressed immediate surface defects but promoted subsurface damage nucleation. Crack propagation followed slip lines or their intersections, demonstrating sensitivity to local stress states. These findings offer important insights into nanoscale damage mechanisms, which are essential for optimizing precision machining processes to minimise SSD in SiC substrates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.