ArticleMicromachines2025
Improving Laser Direct Writing Overlay Precision Based on a Deep Learning Method.
Article in Micromachines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study proposes a deep learning-based method to improve overlay alignment precision in laser direct writing systems. Alignment errors arise from multiple sources in nanoscale processes, including optical aberrations, mechanical drift, and fiducial mark imperfections. A significant portion of the residual alignment error stems from the interpretation of mark coordinates by the vision system and algorithms. Here, we developed a convolutional neural network (CNN) model to predict the coordinates calculation error of 66,000 sets of computer-generated defective crosshair marks (simulating real fiducial mark imperfections). We compared 14 neural network architectures (8 CNN variants and 6 feedforward neural network (FNN) configurations) and found a well-performing, simple CNN structure achieving a mean squared error (MSE) of 0.0011 on the training sets and 0.0016 on the validation sets, demonstrating 90% error reduction compared to the FNN structure. Experimental results on test datasets showed the CNN's capability to maintain prediction errors below 100 nm in both X/Y coordinates, significantly outperforming traditional FNN approaches. The proposed method's success stems from the CNN's inherent advantages in local feature extraction and translation invariance, combined with a simplified network architecture that prevents overfitting while maintaining computational efficiency. This breakthrough establishes a new paradigm for precision enhancement in micro-nano optical device fabrication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.